- #MICROSOFT FORTRAN POWERSTATION 4.0 WINDOWS 7 64 BIT#
- #MICROSOFT FORTRAN POWERSTATION 4.0 WINDOWS 7 CODE#
- #MICROSOFT FORTRAN POWERSTATION 4.0 WINDOWS 7 WINDOWS 7#
The example module below generates an error with gfortran when compiled with the arguments "gfortran -c". Although I use Intel Fortran for a majority of my needs, we have a few applications that require gcc/gfortran as well. The procedure compiles without error in IVF 19.0.2.190. I have a program that uses an overloaded procedure, an example of which is given below. In particular the /Qopenmp and /standard-semantics flags are selected in both cases. I've looked at the compiler options in my original Visual Studio project file and in the CMake-generated one, and they look the same as far as I can tell. I don't see the error where I use other OpenMP parallel constructs, such as SECTIONS. and its extensions (such as SIMD, COLLAPSE etc.). and occurs everywhere that I use !$OMP PARALLEL DO
![microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7 microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7](https://slideplayer.com/slide/5836901/19/images/126/The+Visual+Fortran+Module+Wizard.jpg)
Every error message is the same: error #5082: Syntax error, found INTEGER_CONSTANT '1' when expecting one of: NONE PRIVATE FIRSTPRIVATE SHARED However, when I try to compile this project, which makes extensive use of OpenMP, I find that I get error messages on every OpenMP tag.
#MICROSOFT FORTRAN POWERSTATION 4.0 WINDOWS 7 CODE#
I have a Fortran project that I normally compile using a hand-made Visual Studio project file, but I'm in the process of reconfiguring my whole build system using CMake so that I can more easily port the same source code between different compilers and platforms. If it hasn't been fixed, we would hope the version 20 could include a fix for this. If it works, that would be the next relase for our team to migrate to. We think that perhaps we will be going to evaluate ifort 20 when it comes out to see if we can validate this compiler version with our application. We would like to hear if this is a known bug if it has been fixed since 17.1 was released.
#MICROSOFT FORTRAN POWERSTATION 4.0 WINDOWS 7 WINDOWS 7#
On Windows 7 the high order bit of ecx is always off so it works there.Īgain, we are using ifort 17.1. On Windows 10, the high order bit of ecx is on causing the address in rcx to be huge.
![microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7 microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7](https://static.fdokumen.com/img/345x275/reader023/reader/2020111422/5b2dc4027f8b9adc6e8bef6f/r-1.jpg)
It uses this instruction movsxd rcx,ecx to sign extend to 64 bits. The assembly code of SetHandle (resides in ifwin.lib) thinks the address of lParam is 32bits. ! INFO was allocated in the MDIWndProc at IDM_NEW time and is These three lines appear in the template sample code (WinApp1.f90 line 552) generated by the Fortran Application Wizard. If you want to give them more, here’s the technical jargon: The above is probably enough for the ticket.
#MICROSOFT FORTRAN POWERSTATION 4.0 WINDOWS 7 64 BIT#
I built the 64 bit version with command line tools and tested it on windows 7 (worked) and windows 10 (crashed). I see that they are on version 19.0 while I am running version 10.1.021ĭennis created the sample MDI test-case with Visual Studio. Intel may have already fixed the problem. Would it be possible for you to enter the report, since you already have an account?
![microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7 microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7](http://img.kxdw.com/2020/0717/20200717110102160.png)
Select this project type : Multiple Document Interface (MDI) sample codeĪn MDI child window MDI 0 will appear on a Windows 7 machine, but will crash on Windows 10. In the New Project window, select a project type under Intel(R) Visual Fortran It turns out that it is easy to create a test case that demonstrates the problem.
![microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7 microsoft fortran powerstation 4.0 windows 7](https://slideplayer.com/slide/5836901/19/images/123/Choose+Fortran+Module+Wizard+from+the+Tools+menu.jpg)
They were able to reproduce the crash with an MDI example code as documented below: The IT support people have traced this to what is believed to be a bug in the ifort libraries. Similarly rebuilding from the same source code on windows 10 (same compilers) still crashes on windows 10. The GUI set up has been working to our knowledge on windows 7 but fails (crashes) if we run the same application on a windows 10 computer. We are building an MDI windows application under windows 7 with MS visual studio 2015 and intel fortran 17.1.